Logic Course for the Nile Project

Nile Project = Ethiopia – “nech-lebashoch”= EPRDF

(101 logic course in Autocracy as presented on the 5th of April 2011 by the PM in the Ethiopian parliament /Interpretation/)

Elaboration:

Universal Theorem 1; for poli maths:

Dangerous for a minority is the majority.

Universal Theorem 2; for ethnic poli-maths:

Dangerous for a minority ethnic rule is the ethnic majority

Ethiopian application:

1. Contain majority

2. Contain ethnic majority

3. Attack the radical majority section

4. Dismember all majority affiliations

Majority --> Ethnic majority --> radical majority --> all majority --> every member
All Ethiopians--> Oromos --> OLF ---> Legal Oromo-parties --> intimidate every member of the majority

Ethiopia has to get rid of its enemies for its developing existence. In the Nile Project, the Enemies are functionally chained to Egypt as follows.

Enemy EGYPT = A function (variable, Eritrea)

Enemy Eritrea = A function (variable, Terrorism); Terrorists: OLF etc.

Enemy Terrorism/OLF = A function (variable, medrek)

Enemy medrek = A function (varable, opposition parties)

Enemy Opp.Parties = A function (variable, majority Ethiopians)

Enemy majority = A function (variable, Oromos)

Enemy Oromos = A function (variable, others)

Enemy Others = A function (variable, none-eprdfs)

That means in the final analysis,

Enemy Egypt = a function ( variable,none-eprdfs)

That means all none-eprdfs are enemies.

These enemies are called “nech-lebashoch”/ “the third battalion”

Enemies/”Nech-lebashoch”/ have to be made dysfunctional or eliminated for the Nile Project to function.

Nile project = Ethiopia – none-eprdfs = EPRFites = ETHIOPIA

Nile project = EPRDF(1*= ETHIOPIA

Who are the none-eprdfites?  The Anti-meleses.

All these variables have got a name called: "nech-lebashoch" because they all work against the Ethiopian development.
 

And which are the majority of these “nech-lebashoch”, among the population of Ethiopia?

The OROMOS.

Oromos are variables of Eritrea: I.e. Eritrea = Function( oromos).

Therefore if you attack Oromos, you have attacked Eritrea and can consider it as declaring war on Eritrea.  Accordingly, if you make them dysfunctional you can remain in power for long and avoid the social contagion of Egypt and Tunisia!

***

1*) EPRDF was 30 years ago a function of Eritrea and Egypt. Therefore there can still be some eprdfites, who have still remained “nech-lebashoch”. All those “anti-melese” eprdfites  are still “nech-lebashoch “and enemies.

„Nech-Lebashoch „ and the Nile project

„Nech-Lebashoch (1 „ and the Nile project (the logic of autocracy)

http://www.ethiotube.net/video/13419/ETV-News--Diaspora--domestic-public-comment-on-the-new-dam-project-on-Abay
Listen to the Interview of AA inhabitants (specially the irony of the old woman at the middle of the interviewed )

http://www.diretube.com/ethiopian-news/pm-meles-addressing-the-parliament-april-05-2011-part-2-video_9ab2626e1.html
*

The Nile Project as a project of Ethiopian development,  functionalized in the logic of autocracy.

Nile Project is a function of Ethiopia. But Egypt has always been an enemy of Ethiopia, and tries to make Ethiopia a function of Egypt by disrupting its development and employing the Nile River for its own development only(1*. For this purpose, Egypt has a variable called Eritrea. Eritrea has variables called terrorist organizations(OLF) and NGOs, Terrorist organizations(OLF etc.) have variables called legal organizations, legal organizations have a variable called  medrek. Medrek has its member organizations as variables. Member organizations have their members as variables and members have bodies and minds as variables. Variables have the attribute of varying and not behaving to abide by the rule; incapable of loving the Ethiopian prime-minister Melese...

Expressed in their simple poli-maths.

The Formula: 

Nile Project = Ethiopia - Egypt(Eritrea) - Eritrea(OLF) - OLF(MEDREK) - MEDREK(All Opposition+NGO) - NoneEPRDF- AntiEPRDF – AntiMelese (this section = 0)

Nile Project = Ethiopia.

Elaboration:

Universal Theorem 1; for poli maths:

Dangerous for a minority is the majority.

Universal Theorem 2; for ethnic poli-maths:

Dangerous for a minority ethnic rule is the ethnic majority

Ethiopian application:

1. Contain majority

2. Contain ethnic majority

3. Attack the radical majority section

4. Dismember all majority affiliations

Majority --> Ethnic majority --> radical majority --> all majority --> every member
All Ethiopians--> Oromos --> OLF ---> Legal Oromo-parties --> intimidate every member of the majority

Ethiopia has to get rid of its enemies for its developing existence. The Enemies are functionally chained to Egypt as follows.

Enemy EGYPT = A function (variable, Eritrea)

Enemy Eritrea = A function (variable, Terrorism); Terrorists: OLF etc.

Enemy Terrorism/OLF = A function (variable, medrek)

Enemy medrek = A function (varable, opposition parties)

Enemy Opp.Parties = A function (variable, majority Ethiopians)

Enemy majority = A function (variable, Oromos)

Enemy Oromos = A function (variable, others)

Enemy Others = A function (variable, none-eprdfs)

That means in the final analysis,

Enemy Egypt = a function ( variable,none-eprdfs)

That means all none-eprdfs are enemies.

These enemies are called “nech-lebashoch”/ “the third battalion”

Enemies/”Nech-lebashoch”/ have to be made dysfunctional or eliminated for the Nile Project to function.

Nile project = Ethiopia – none-eprdfs = EPRFites = ETHIOPIA

Nile project = EPRDF(1*= ETHIOPIA

Who are the none-eprdfite?

The Anti-meleses

All these variables have got a name called: "nech-lebashoch" because they all work against the Ethiopian development.
 

And which are the majority of these “nech-lebashoch”, among the population of Ethiopia?

The OROMOS.

SO:

OLF is here the big variable. And the real targets are the OROMOS! According to Ethnic -poli-maths, OLF belongs to the ethnic majority -the OROMOS. Since the majority is the arc enemy of the minority, in poli-maths, the whole calculation amounts to de-functionalize OLF from the source - the OROMOS. And the declaration of War is a war against the Oromos in action and has nothing to do with Eritrea! Eritrea is just the cover-packet of the campaign to instigate the usual unhealthy basic ethnic instincts of racism among Ethiopians!

The only response to this danger is 

1. An unequivocal solidarity with all Oromos !

2. Upholding the rule of majority and Democracy!

_______________________________

(1* Egypt has existed for thousands of years, including the last 30 years, during the creation and liberation of Eritrea. And by the same logic the TPLFs were at the service of Eritrea and by proxy Egypt while working for “the liberation of Tigrai” and ultimately for the liberation of Ethiopia from the Military regime, through EPRDF. Since Egypt has the particular capacity to make all around it “nech-lebash”,  Ethiopia has then the peculiar fate of being a function of Egypt, consisting of only “nech-lebashoch” since the EPRDFites must have also been  “nech-lebashoch”.  And in the final analysis that means there are no Ethiopians in Ethiopia. Ethiopia without Ethiopians is ridiculous. Thus there is no need for ETHIOPIA. That is the objective of the whole dance around the bush! The unconscious tenor of Melese’s discourse on “nech-lebashoch”. Authentic remains his spontanous position 15 years back on Ethiopia; like "Bandira cherk new" and "Ethiopia is just a century old" etc.

(1 "Nech Lebashoch", Amharic meaning foreign agents

NILE

Nile, Ethiopia & legitimacy politics

The Nile Valley Civilization and the Spread of African Culture  (cf. An Ethiopian Journal)

COMMON Background African History worth reading to highlight that any "conflict politics" on the issue is detrimental to all concerned!

There is no doubt that, any "Nile development project" through concerted deliberation, can always be honored by any Ethiopian. However, it is it is irresponsible and treacherous to catapult Nile to a source of unnecessary regional conflict, with the ulterior purpose of compensating it for any past political misgivings and present political demands for change. –An immature political discourse which cannot be undone without a fundamental change.

Let's come to the 21st Century!

Slavoj Žižek

Slavoj Žižek on Hegel!

„Is It Still Possible to Be a Hegelian Today?“ (video available now)
(s. résumé in German)

The Slowenian Philosopher Slavoj Žižek made a lecture on Hegel in Dahlem Humanities Center/ "Free University Berlin"/ "Freie Universität Berlin".

31.03.2011, 19:00 

**********************

The guest philosopher was invited in the "Freie Universität Berlin"/FU Berlin/, by Dahlem Humanities Center...

Even If you don’t fully share his perception and philosophy, listening to this man was a relish!  A relish for the mind! All the more, having in mind the pathetic display, our "philosophers" of his generation are making today; either serving tyrants or disseminating their gospels of hate and vengeance.

The man is a display of authentic thought in action, on stage for demonstration; speaking with all his body and temperament. He reminded me of one young philosopher, - killed by the military regime in the 80s struggling for a better Ethiopia, who was fugitive while talking and discussing; may be an attribute of real philosophers!

Audi Max (Henry Ford Bau, the biggest hall of the university ) was full of young people and some old University-staff; tight including the Foyer upstairs. It looked like one of the teach-ins in the troubled days of the 70s… I would guess 500-700 men and women. There were hardly any guest public intellectuals during the recent past, who were visited by such a mass of young people! Even the South African Nobel peace laureate, Archbishop Desmond Tutu during his University “Award for Freedom”  (clip) could not attract as much attendee as Slavoj Žižek did.

http://www.fu-berlin.de/campusleben/campus/2011/110401_zizek/index.html

Slavoj Žižek appeared in his accustomed T-shirt/Pullover. After a short unspectacular greeting in German, he said in a joke...to make his position/”Weltanschauung”  at the outset clear, 

" Sorry my German is insufficient, I have to use the language of Imperialism"...

As soon as he begins with his thoughts, in his brilliant fugitive way, he just takes control of your attention so that you have to participate in the process of his thoughts, developing his lecture on the move; out of the notes he seems to improvise in the air and at the moment.  Any "gentleman „ even  if he happens to be  uncomfortable in the non-elegant appearance of the "professor", looking  at Zizek's accustomed  T-shirt-Pullover,  may be forced to take part immediately in this process.  - He would say; a demonstration of the Hegelian dialectics of content and form, here, with content taking over the supremacy!
*
After more than 60 minutes uninterrupted discourse on the Theme; " Is it still possible to be Hegelian?"; declaring or interpreting almost every philosopher or artists he mentioned  to be in effect a Hegelian in disguise,  including spiritual leaders like Jesus and "god" himself in absentia, incapable of saving his own "Son" from suffering,  delegating the problem to humanity etc. etc.  even with a reprimand that Hegel himself was not “Hegelian” enough; and interpreting  Marx for not "inversing" Hegel but accusing him of being less "Hegelian" than he could have been, but a condition Hegel couldn't help.....living in the era of small manufactures, without the development of science  as we know it today  and "Capital" just  in the period of its initial birth....leaving the challenge for Marx to help him later in  political economy...and we today are left with the legacies  of the Adorno’s  etc...to reflect more on "globalization"....

*

I would say, He, as a materialist, even went so far to conclusively declare the supremacy of "thinking" to "action" in post modernity!

He said, „Still placated in the Humboldt University today, we have to inverse that famous message of Marx, "Philosophers have interpreted the world, the point is to change it”. A point which made us too keen for action has to be reversed again: "politicians have changed the world; the point is however now, to think it all over again and make it better.” (Paraphrased)
*

For him, it seemed that,

THE CONTEMPORARY NEW HEGELIAN amounts to be:

“THE CLASSICAL HEGEL x THE SECULAR INTERPRETATION OF CHRISTIANITY (love your enemy etc.) x THE INCLUSIVE DOCTRINE OF ISLAM x THE YOUNG MARX x KIERKEGAARD’S REPETETION + DELEUZE’S DISGUISED HEGLIANISM COMBINED TOGETHER WITH A FURTHER REFLECTION OF THE RIGHT EMERGING OUT OF THE MANY WRONGS; ALWAYS RESULTING IN THE BEAUTIFUL "UNKNOWN" – THE NEVER EXHAUSTED CONTINGENCY OF NEW REALITIES” (take x as interacting with).

*
The man is simply a demonstration of thinking per se. I enjoyed every second!
Just for your imagination to anticipate the scope of his proceedings...I would simply note (unstructured) some of the concepts, ideas and persons which crossed his mind and lips (hoping that the lecture will be available sometime in the future, at least in Audio to share it with the internet-public).

Adorno, Schoenberg, Music
Heinrich von Kleist
Kierkegaard, existentialism

Repetition

Dosteyevsky

Jesus, god, contingency
Nature, culture, nurture, education....
Imperialism
Terrorism,
Starbucks and African solidarity,

Even our solidarity sold in the commodity
Congo,
Catholicism
Deleuze, who didn’t know that he is a Hegelian.
Wagner, Tristan und Isolde
Adultery Love and marriage,

Sexuality, psychoanalysis

Freud

Kant,
Brecht,
Heisenberg
Bohr and Quantum Physic, the split experiment
Stephen Hawkins, searching for the Absolute
God
Hegel and the Absolute, negation of the negation etc.
The French revolution, Jacobins,
terror - antiterrorism,
the wrongs - and its cherubs the corrects etc.
Kafka,
Rabbis,
children games, battle games with the unknown end etc.
The Russian Rabi and Communism - two reasons to leave-(joke)
the Japan disaster; Atomic reactors, environment, ecology...
and  what not..
The right out the wrong, , emergence etc.
Russia and communism
our past, the present ...
etc.

may be almost all philosophers and intellectuals are in his minds, all like what he coined  in a joke as:
All "from Plato to NATO..."
*

HIS MESSAGE WAS MORE OR LESS:-

Think!  Think! Dare to Contemplate! And “THEY” will be afraid of “YOU”! High Time to think! Up to now, we were too keen to change the world...
*
After an hour and a half, accompanied by an uninterrupted applause, he left with the comment,

"Save your Applause for later. Don't worry, we will force you to applaud too, when we radical leftist come to power!" suggesting "think before you applaud"!
I.e. we can never be perfect.  The point is to be open for all contingencies; i.e. the unknown is beautiful
*
In a Word,

-the man has A beautiful MIND, worth attending and contemplating on what he has to say and convey!

-the man conveys some hope of the “second” wave of enlightenment coming to salvage our contemporary troubled humanity!

***********************************************************

Just for the intermediate period (the video/audio publication of his speech) here is a related Reference:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5WNcRoCXCM

And
Reflections on the North African and the Arab Spring